Skip to main content

Compressing Pictures in Microsoft Outlook 2007

We've all been there... and it's becoming more of an issue.  Grandma, mom, or "that" user complains about how long it takes to send pictures - and it must be the computer... the internet... the antivirus... the conspiracy that the technology companies have created so they have to purchase a new router... updated PC... faster DSL or Cable... yes... you know THEM!!!  Who knows, you could be one of THEM and never even knew it!!!

I must add some basic caveats... try this at your own risk - my posts were created by an idiot... my wife can confirm that fact.  I'm not responsible if I messed up the directions, or if you are incapable of following them, or even if you do follow them correctly, and something bad happens.  Always validate and verify any instructions you receive.  That's good advice for life, and technology.  I always test any techniques I learn on something of no value I would normally discard anyway.

I've placed some general instructions to optimize the picture below.  I haven't tried this with other versions of Microsoft Office / Outlook to verify it works.  However, I suspect it does.  When I have a chance, I'll verify and post it later.

The general steps for the example.
  1. In Microsoft Outlook 2007, create a new mail message.
  2. You can either attach pictures to the message by using the "attach file" paperclip, or by using Windows Explorer and selecting a group of photos using your preferred "copy" technique.  
  3. After you use the paperclip, or the "paste" technique, you end up with something like the image below.
  4. Once you have attachments, you click the drop down arrow I've highlighted in Step #2 below (on the Message tab on Outlook).
  5. You can decide your level of compression using the drop down dialogue box on the right panel.  If you decide this method works, then you can click the bottom checkbox a shown in Step #4 below so the dialogue appears every time you attach photos.  
  6. Finish your email, and hit send.
You should try different resolutions and send them to yourself to see what works best for your requirements.

In the case of the 20 5MB photos listed, they zipped down to a little under 900K.  That's great for sharing.  It won't work if Grandma wants to print a 11x14 photo of one of the pictures.  This technique is really meant to compress pictures for viewing pleasure, not for printing.  Use your own common sense, and testing to ensure that whatever you compress still meets your future needs and requirements.  Also wouldn't be a good technique for a wedding photographer to send prints to his developing studio.

I hope this helps!

Happy Computing!

Popular posts from this blog

So you think you know MS Office?

So, you think you know Microsoft Office? I'll be posting some videos to show you some things that may not be real familiar to you. I've been using office...well... for years. Over the years, I've used the following office predecessors... Lotus 1-2-3, AmiPro, Twin, Quattro, WordPerfect, Quattro Pro, WordPerfect Office, and Microsoft Office --- all versions since the beginning. I'll also touch on Databases, and Presentation Software as well. Here's a few thinks I'm thinking of videoing... links to be added later... Excel - formatting, advanced filling, pivoting data, outlining series, advanced macros, graphs, etc. Word - just the basics - columns, headers, footers, styles, interoperability, etc. PowerPoint - adding pizazz like transitions, animations, meaningful data, and good presentation skills. Access - basic data and forms entry, validation, lookups, reports, advanced queries, etc. Advanced SQL - you know you want to learn more about this... set tight and I

Project Tracking in Google Docs (and some cool new spreadsheet features)

http://projectmanagement.informationloop.com/2013/11/tracking-project-time-in-google-docs.html I had a recent need to find a new method of doing time reporting against projects and services.  My services have different resource commitments, and its important that we show our customers and stakeholders that we are fairly delivering value.  Before you make the normal sigh, and under your breath mumble what a waste of time... hear me out! Why does it add value?  Let's go to the root of the reason why we track time.  Is it to hold our staff accountable for punching a clock?  No, if you evaluate technology professionals on how much time they spend in front of a keyboard typing, shame on you.  You skills are dated.  You should judge a person's contribution based on the value they deliver.  Would you pay a mechanic that looks busy for four hours $600 for a basic car inspection when everything passes and no repairs are necessary?  No, obviously not.  You want some type of value.  J